| |
THE RESULTS
Integré
Partners recently conducted a survey, asking thousands of
Private Equity, Venture Capital and M&A professionals to share their thoughts
regarding hiring practices in a recessionary period.
SUMMARY
- Recessions do not appear to impact leadership changes, but do precipitate more
changing out of other management.
- Only a third of portfolio companies have invoked hiring freezes.
- More than half of respondents felt hiring restrictions would persist into
2010.
- Most respondents are still making executive hiring decisions based on a static
functional basis rather than using a dynamic leadership model.
THE SPECIFIC RESULTS
52% of respondents felt they would be MORE likely to make a leadership change in
a recession, with 48% LESS apt to make such a change in a portfolio company.
However, 76% felt they would be MORE likely to change other management personnel
during a downturn.
For those who felt more inclined to a change, there was little difference in
their ranking of possible reasons:
2.2 - Need for Different Skills
2.4 - Cost Savings
2.8 - Drive Change in Culture
2.9 - Board Pressure
Those who were disinclined to make a change, cited the following:
2.1 - Postpone Leadership Change Disruptions
2.4 - Send a Strong Cost Control Message
3.0 - Save Recruiting Expense
Only 36% of the respondents had total hiring freezes in place, with 55% feeling
they would not be lifted until sometime in 2010.
Survey participants were asked to choose the top factors they would look for
when hiring a leader in a recession from a list of thirty-four factors studied
over many years by Marcus Buckingham and Donald Clifton as published in Now,
Discover Your Strengths, which we at
Integré
Partners use
as a selection aid. The eight strengths continuously correlated with executive
success (regardless of the business cycle) are listed below along with the top
eight form the survey results:
|
Buckingham/ Clifton |
Survey Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arranger/Orchestrator |
88% - Achievement Orientation |
|
|
|
Command Presence |
88% - Strategic Nature |
|
|
|
Competitive Nature |
33% - Analytical Skill |
|
|
|
Developer
of Others |
33% - Activator of Others |
|
|
|
Maximizer |
29% - Focus |
|
|
|
Responsibility |
25% - Communications |
|
|
|
Self-assurance |
25% - Discipline |
|
|
|
Strategic
Nature |
21% - Arranger/Orchestrator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of those strengths favored by the
respondents, the majority (aside from strategic nature and arranger/orchestrator)
are primarily skills that are applied to the execution of management
functions. Research has shown that leadership is dynamic and requires a
person of strong ego (self-assurance) who wants to win passionately
(competitive nature) and has the personality that creates followership
(command presence). The most effective leaders are almost always those
who consistently develop the people around them, maximizing their
ability to contribute, while simultaneously enhancing the effectiveness
of the organization by balancing a host of strategic and tactical
elements (arranger/orchestrator).
THE SAMPLE
|
Business: |
|
Function:
|
|
Portfolio
Size: |
|
36% |
Private Equity
|
|
36%
Investing |
|
60% |
Less than 6
companies |
|
36% |
Merger &
Acquisition
Advisors |
|
29% Financing |
|
16%
|
6 - 10 companies |
|
12% |
Venture
Capital |
|
29%
Other Staff |
|
24% |
More than 10
companies |
|
16% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|